🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising group of states are exploring parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that phones and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". A law could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a proposal raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended parents to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid first step," said a leading MEP supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. However, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. A prominent charity founded by the family of a girl who was lost after viewing dangerous online content argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and suitable for young users," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, regulation is largely unfolding at the regional government level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a bill prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding adult authorization for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain individuals to follow Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Outside of the West, further states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more measured position. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide debate continues, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers around the world are less and less willing to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.